|
-Quote from Reuben Wang
No, the government SHOULD NOT spend so much more money to make a surveillance network. PAP The government is already under so much flack nowadays for so many things, including this, this and this.
Did I mention this?
Spending more money on unwanted things instead of helping us is wrong.
Did I overstate myself? if that is the case, I am sooooo sorry.
-----------------------------------------
However I vehemently disagree and deny such a fact. Firstly I would like to start over the dispute of the government being in a difficult situation. The government's job is to govern the country and I would not think saving the money for other sorts of their own egocentric needs would allow Singapore to live cordially. If so, the citizens of singapore would look askance at the government and participate in anti-government activities.
Secondly how is spending money to build a crime deterring infrastructure unavailing. The latter was even much skeptical than any other posts I have come across. You are arguing tenuously without sufficient proof and are indeed commenting on the uselessness of CCT surveillance.
To reinforce my previous statement I would like to quote and alter my previous post which says that when the criminal investigation department does not have enough evidence of any single case, they could turn to the reliance of CCT surveillance. Alongside with that, a CCT surveillance would not cost more than two hundred each. Although it may be a big sum to individuals, but to the government holding Singapore's destiny along with countless millions or billions of cash I would see it as a cheap and nifty device to avert crime in Singapore.
And another small notification, I think your words just suffice to the word count, &
sorry to sound both sardonic but seriously no offense to any misconceptions and opposition to your perceptions.
Daryl Peh 25 2E
|